2005 Volvo XC90 vs. 2012 Citroen C-Zero
To start off, 2012 Citroen C-Zero is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Volvo XC90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Volvo XC90 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1015 kg more than 2012 Citroen C-Zero.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Citroen C-Zero. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Volvo XC90 | 2012 Citroen C-Zero | |
| Make | Volvo | Citroen |
| Model | XC90 | C-Zero |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1475 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2550 mm |
