2005 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2000 Vauxhall Omega
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Vauxhall Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Vauxhall Omega would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Vauxhall Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2000 Vauxhall Omega. (142 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 2000 Vauxhall Omega. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Vauxhall Omega weights approximately 1165 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | 2000 Vauxhall Omega | |
| Make | Westfield | Vauxhall |
| Model | XTR 2 | Omega |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 2196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 142 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1605 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2740 mm |
