2005 Westfield XTR 2 vs. 2008 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Westfield XTR 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Westfield XTR 2 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1354 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | 2008 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Westfield | Cadillac |
| Model | XTR 2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 1297 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 173 HP | 307 HP |
| Engine RPM | 9800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 440 kg | 1794 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3690 mm | 4870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2890 mm |
