2005 Xedos 9 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Xedos 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Xedos 9 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 2005 Xedos 9. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2005 Xedos 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 999 kg more than 2005 Xedos 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (508 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Xedos 9. (212 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2012 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Xedos 9.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Xedos 9 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Xedos | Land Rover |
Model | 9 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 212 Nm | 508 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2584 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2891 mm |