2005 Zastava 103 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Zastava 103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Zastava 103 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford C-Max is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford C-Max (105 HP) has 46 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford C-Max should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford C-Max weights approximately 630 kg more than 2005 Zastava 103. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford C-Max (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Zastava 103 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Zastava | Ford |
| Model | 103 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 105 HP |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2788 mm |
