2005 Zastava 103 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Zastava 103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Zastava 103 would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (138 HP) has 79 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (167 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze has automatic transmission and 2005 Zastava 103 has manual transmission. 2005 Zastava 103 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Zastava 103 | 2012 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
Model | 103 | Cruze |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 88 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1797 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2685 mm |