2005 Zastava 103 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Zastava 103. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Zastava 103 would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Zastava 103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2005 Zastava 103. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2005 Zastava 103.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Zastava 103. (88 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Zastava 103.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Zastava 103 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Zastava | Nissan |
| Model | 103 | Micra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2449 mm |
