2005 ZAZ Wagon vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mitsubishi Colt weights approximately 805 kg more than 2005 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 ZAZ Wagon | 2010 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | ZAZ | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Wagon | Colt |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1091 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 50 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9:01 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 745 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1570 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2500 mm |
