2006 Acura CSX vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura CSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura CSX would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura CSX (197 HP) has 77 more horse power than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (120 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 2013 Honda CR-Z. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura CSX weights approximately 117 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura CSX | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Acura | Honda |
| Model | CSX | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4544 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1752 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1435 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 6.8 L/100km | 5.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
