2006 Acura RL vs. 1966 Alvis TF
To start off, 2006 Acura RL is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Alvis TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Alvis TF would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RL (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Alvis TF. (150 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1966 Alvis TF.
Because 2006 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Alvis TF. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RL (347 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Alvis TF. (247 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Alvis TF.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RL | 1966 Alvis TF | |
Make | Acura | Alvis |
Model | RL | TF |
Year Released | 2006 | 1966 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3473 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 347 Nm | 247 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 64 L |