2006 Acura RL vs. 1984 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2006 Acura RL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,474 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura RL weights approximately 378 kg more than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2006 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RL | 1984 Chrysler Le Baron | |
| Make | Acura | Chrysler |
| Model | RL | Le Baron |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3474 cc | 2212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1578 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4570 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 53 L |
