2006 Acura RL vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2006 Acura RL is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 23 kg more than 2006 Acura RL.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RL | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
| Model | RL | Triax |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3471 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2790 mm |
