2006 Acura RL vs. 2001 BMW Z9
To start off, 2006 Acura RL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 BMW Z9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 BMW Z9 would be higher. At 4,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 BMW Z9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RL (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 BMW Z9. (286 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2001 BMW Z9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 BMW Z9 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2006 Acura RL.
Because 2006 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 BMW Z9. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 BMW Z9 (597 Nm) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RL. (347 Nm). This means 2001 BMW Z9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RL | 2001 BMW Z9 | |
| Make | Acura | BMW |
| Model | RL | Z9 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3473 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 290 HP | 286 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7400 RPM |
| Torque | 347 Nm | 597 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1615 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 63 L |
