2006 Acura RL vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2006 Acura RL is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RL (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura RL weights approximately 205 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RL (347 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2006 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RL | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Acura | Lancia |
Model | RL | Nea |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3473 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 347 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2590 mm |