2006 Acura RL vs. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee

To start off, 2006 Acura RL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RL (290 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. (266 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 365 kg more than 2006 Acura RL.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee (450 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RL. (347 Nm). This means 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RL.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura RL 2003 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Make Acura Jeep
Model RL Grand Cherokee
Year Released 2006 2003
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3473 cc 4701 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 290 HP 266 HP
Torque 347 Nm 450 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1940 kg
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4620 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1770 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2700 mm