2006 Acura RL vs. 2009 Volvo C70
To start off, 2009 Volvo C70 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura RL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura RL would be higher. At 3,473 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RL (290 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2009 Volvo C70. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2009 Volvo C70.
Because 2006 Acura RL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RL (347 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Volvo C70. 2006 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 2009 Volvo C70 has manual transmission. 2009 Volvo C70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RL | 2009 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RL | C70 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3473 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 290 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 347 Nm | 236 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.1 L/100km | 9.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |