2006 Acura RSX vs. 1949 Bristol 450
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Bristol 450. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Bristol 450 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1949 Bristol 450. (154 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1949 Bristol 450.
Because 1949 Bristol 450 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Bristol 450. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1949 Bristol 450 | |
Make | Acura | Bristol |
Model | RSX | 450 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1971 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 54 L |