2006 Acura RSX vs. 1952 Allard Safari
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Allard Safari. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Allard Safari would be higher. At 3,621 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Allard Safari is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 1952 Allard Safari. (85 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1952 Allard Safari.
Because 1952 Allard Safari is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Allard Safari. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Allard Safari (203 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1952 Allard Safari will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1952 Allard Safari | |
Make | Acura | Allard |
Model | RSX | Safari |
Year Released | 2006 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3621 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 81 L |