2006 Acura RSX vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil

To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1962 DAF Daffodil.

Because 1962 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura RSX 1962 DAF Daffodil
Make Acura DAF
Model RSX Daffodil
Year Released 2006 1962
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 746 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 201 HP 26 HP
Engine RPM 7800 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 190 Nm 53 Nm
Torque RPM 7000 RPM 2800 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 3620 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1450 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2060 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 33 L