2006 Acura RSX vs. 1963 Alpine A 110
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Alpine A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Alpine A 110 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1963 Alpine A 110. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1963 Alpine A 110.
Because 1963 Alpine A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Alpine A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1963 Alpine A 110 | |
Make | Acura | Alpine |
Model | RSX | A 110 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 954 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |