2006 Acura RSX vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Acura | Seat |
Model | RSX | 600 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2010 mm |