2006 Acura RSX vs. 1968 Bizzarrini A3C
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Bizzarrini A3C would be higher. At 5,354 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (361 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 2006 Acura RSX. (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura RSX.
Because 1968 Bizzarrini A3C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Bizzarrini A3C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Bizzarrini A3C (510 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1968 Bizzarrini A3C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RSX | 1968 Bizzarrini A3C | |
| Make | Acura | Bizzarrini |
| Model | RSX | A3C |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5354 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 361 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 510 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2460 mm |
