2006 Acura RSX vs. 1968 Holden Belmont
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Belmont. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Belmont would be higher. At 3,043 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1968 Holden Belmont. (108 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1968 Holden Belmont.
Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Belmont (246 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Belmont will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1968 Holden Belmont | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | RSX | Belmont |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2830 mm |