2006 Acura RSX vs. 1974 Reliant Rebel
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Reliant Rebel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Reliant Rebel would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1974 Reliant Rebel. (31 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1974 Reliant Rebel.
Because 1974 Reliant Rebel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Reliant Rebel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Reliant Rebel. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Reliant Rebel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1974 Reliant Rebel | |
Make | Acura | Reliant |
Model | RSX | Rebel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 31 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2270 mm |