2006 Acura RSX vs. 1975 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 1300.
Because 1975 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 1300. (94 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1975 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Acura | Zastava |
Model | RSX | 1300 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2430 mm |