2006 Acura RSX vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (155 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura RSX weights approximately 524 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Acura | Zastava |
Model | RSX | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2160 mm |