2006 Acura RSX vs. 1982 Jeep CJ7
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Jeep CJ7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Jeep CJ7 would be higher. At 2,068 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Jeep CJ7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Because 1982 Jeep CJ7 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Jeep CJ7 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Jeep CJ7. (128 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Jeep CJ7.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1982 Jeep CJ7 | |
Make | Acura | Jeep |
Model | RSX | CJ7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2380 mm |