2006 Acura RSX vs. 1982 Pontiac 1000
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Pontiac 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Pontiac 1000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (52 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Pontiac 1000.
Because 1982 Pontiac 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Pontiac 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Pontiac 1000. (99 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Pontiac 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1982 Pontiac 1000 | |
Make | Acura | Pontiac |
Model | RSX | 1000 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1817 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 99 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2400 mm |