2006 Acura RSX vs. 1989 Citroen XM
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1989 Citroen XM. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1989 Citroen XM.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Citroen XM (225 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1989 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1989 Citroen XM | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | RSX | XM |
Year Released | 2006 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |