2006 Acura RSX vs. 1992 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1992 Chrysler ES. (139 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1992 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chrysler ES (232 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1992 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RSX | 1992 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | Acura | Chrysler |
| Model | RSX | ES |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2470 mm |
