2006 Acura RSX vs. 1994 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1994 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RSX | 1994 Chrysler ES | |
| Make | Acura | Chrysler |
| Model | RSX | ES |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2213 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 166 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2470 mm |
