2006 Acura RSX vs. 1994 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1994 Rover 200. (198 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1994 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 200 (237 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RSX | 1994 Rover 200 | |
| Make | Acura | Rover |
| Model | RSX | 200 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
