2006 Acura RSX vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | RSX | 200 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2510 mm |