2006 Acura RSX vs. 1998 Caterham C21
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Caterham C21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Caterham C21 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1998 Caterham C21. (115 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1998 Caterham C21.
Because 1998 Caterham C21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Caterham C21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Caterham C21. (146 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Caterham C21.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 1998 Caterham C21 | |
Make | Acura | Caterham |
Model | RSX | C21 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2260 mm |