2006 Acura RSX vs. 2000 Citroen Xsara

To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen Xsara (165 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2006 Acura RSX. (155 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura RSX weights approximately 74 kg more than 2000 Citroen Xsara.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen Xsara (193 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura RSX 2000 Citroen Xsara
Make Acura Citroen
Model RSX Xsara
Year Released 2006 2000
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 155 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 193 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1274 kg 1200 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4190 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1710 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 54 L