2006 Acura RSX vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Celica. (74 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Because 2000 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 432 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | RSX | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |