2006 Acura RSX vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX. 2001 Mazda CU-X has automatic transmission and 2006 Acura RSX has manual transmission. 2006 Acura RSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Mazda CU-X will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Acura | Mazda |
Model | RSX | CU-X |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 80 L |