2006 Acura RSX vs. 2003 BMW X5
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW X5 (338 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 2006 Acura RSX. (201 HP @ 7800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura RSX.
Because 2003 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 BMW X5 (400 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm @ 7000 RPM). This means 2003 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX. 2003 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2006 Acura RSX has manual transmission. 2006 Acura RSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 2003 BMW X5 | |
Make | Acura | BMW |
Model | RSX | X5 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 338 HP |
Engine RPM | 7800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 400 Nm |
Torque RPM | 7000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 18.3 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 13.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 93 L |