2006 Acura RSX vs. 2003 Mazda MPV

To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (155 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Mazda MPV. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda MPV weights approximately 366 kg more than 2006 Acura RSX.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda MPV (207 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura RSX 2003 Mazda MPV
Make Acura Mazda
Model RSX MPV
Year Released 2006 2003
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 2260 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 155 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 207 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1274 kg 1640 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4780 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1790 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2680 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.4 L/100km 8.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 50 L