2006 Acura RSX vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2006 Acura RSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (295 HP) has 94 more horse power than 2006 Acura RSX. (201 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura RSX.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (448 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (190 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Acura | GMC |
Model | RSX | Savana |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 448 Nm |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.6 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 117 L |