2006 Acura RSX vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura RSX weights approximately 197 kg more than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Because 2008 Nissan Livina is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura RSX (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2006 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura RSX | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RSX | Livina |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1274 kg | 1077 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 52 L |