2006 Acura RSX vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (155 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura RSX | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
| Make | Acura | Aston Martin |
| Model | RSX | Cygnet |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 155 HP | 99 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
