2006 Acura RSX vs. 2012 Subaru Forester

To start off, 2012 Subaru Forester is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura RSX would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura RSX (155 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Subaru Forester. (145 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2012 Subaru Forester. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Forester weights approximately 276 kg more than 2006 Acura RSX.

Because 2012 Subaru Forester is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Subaru Forester (350 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura RSX. (188 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura RSX.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura RSX 2012 Subaru Forester
Make Acura Subaru
Model RSX Forester
Year Released 2006 2012
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Horse Power 155 HP 145 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 350 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1600 RPM
Drive Type Front AWD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1274 kg 1550 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 4559 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1781 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1674 mm
Wheelbase Size 2580 mm 2616 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 6.9 L/100km 5.3 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 9.4 L/100km 7.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.4 L/100km 6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 50 L 64 L