2006 Acura TL vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2006 Acura TL is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura TL (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura TL weights approximately 85 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1941 Volvo PV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1941 Volvo PV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura TL | 1941 Volvo PV | |
| Make | Acura | Volvo |
| Model | TL | PV |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 3212 cc | 3668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 258 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |
