2006 Acura TL vs. 1978 Renault Alpine
To start off, 2006 Acura TL is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault Alpine would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura TL (258 HP) has 110 more horse power than 1978 Renault Alpine. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1978 Renault Alpine.
Because 1978 Renault Alpine is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Renault Alpine. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura TL (316 Nm) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Renault Alpine. (204 Nm). This means 2006 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Renault Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura TL | 1978 Renault Alpine | |
| Make | Acura | Renault |
| Model | TL | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3212 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 258 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 316 Nm | 204 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
