2006 Acura TL vs. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 2006 Acura TL is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura TL weights approximately 35 kg more than 1980 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1980 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2006 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2006 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura TL | 1980 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | TL | Le Baron |
Year Released | 2006 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3212 cc | 3678 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 258 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2870 mm |