2006 Acura TL vs. 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2006 Acura TL is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 4,300 cc (6 cylinders), 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura TL weights approximately 95 kg more than 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura TL | 1984 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | TL | Monte Carlo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1984 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3212 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 258 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |