2006 Acura TL vs. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2006 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,390 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura TL (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. (158 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Acura TL weights approximately 162 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Acura TL (316 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro. (271 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2006 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Camaro.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura TL 1999 Chevrolet Camaro
Make Acura Chevrolet
Model TL Camaro
Year Released 2006 1999
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3212 cc 3390 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 258 HP 158 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 316 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 92 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 84 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1413 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2450 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 14 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 68 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]