2006 Acura TL vs. 2009 Chrysler 300

To start off, 2009 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura TL would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2006 Acura TL. (258 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Acura TL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2006 Acura TL. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura TL. (316 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura TL. 2009 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2006 Acura TL has manual transmission. 2006 Acura TL will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Acura TL 2009 Chrysler 300
Make Acura Chrysler
Model TL 300
Year Released 2006 2009
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3212 cc 5645 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 258 HP 335 HP
Engine RPM 6200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 316 Nm 525 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89 mm 99.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 90.9 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1910 kg
Vehicle Length 4810 mm 5010 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1490 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 3050 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 12 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 70 L