2006 Acura TL vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Acura TL (258 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2009 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden UTE.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Acura TL. (316 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Acura TL.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Acura TL | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | TL | UTE |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3212 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 258 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 316 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |